Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
1.
Int J Infect Dis ; 123: 212-220, 2022 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2069127

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To identify differences in the clinical and epidemiologic characteristics of patients during the first and second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic at the EsSalud Lambayeque health care network, Peru. METHODS: An analytical cross-sectional study of 53,912 patients enrolled during the first and second waves of COVID-19 was conducted. Cluster analysis based on clustering large applications (CLARA) was applied to clinical-epidemiologic data presented at the time of care. The two pandemic waves were compared using clinical-epidemiologic data from epidemiologic surveillance. RESULTS: Cluster analysis identified four COVID-19 groups with a characteristic pattern. Cluster 1 included the largest number of participants in both waves, and the participants were predominantly female. Cluster 2 included patients with gastrointestinal, respiratory, and systemic symptoms. Cluster 3 was the "severe" cluster, characterized by older adults and patients with dyspnea or comorbidities (cardiovascular, diabetes, obesity). Cluster 4 included asymptomatic, pregnant, and less severe patients. We found differences in all clinical-epidemiologic characteristics according to the cluster to which they belonged. CONCLUSION: Using cluster analysis, we identified characteristic patterns in each group. Respiratory, gastrointestinal, dyspnea, anosmia, and ageusia symptoms were higher in the second COVID-19 wave than the first COVID-19 wave.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Aged , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cluster Analysis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Dyspnea , Female , Humans , Male , Pandemics , Peru/epidemiology , Pregnancy
2.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 44: e148, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1893625

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The analysis of transmission dynamics is crucial to determine whether mitigation or suppression measures reduce the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This study sought to estimate the basic (R0 ) and time-varying (Rt ) reproduction number of COVID-19 and contrast the public health measures for ten South American countries. METHODS: Data was obtained from the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Country-specific R0 values during the first two weeks of the outbreak and Rt values after 90 days were estimated. RESULTS: Countries used a combination of isolation, physical distancing, quarantine, and community-wide containment measures to staunch the spread of COVID-19 at different points in time. R0 ranged from 1.52 (95% confidence interval: 1.13-1.99) in Venezuela to 3.83 (3.04-4.75) in Chile, whereas Rt after 90 days ranged from 0.71 (95% credible interval: 0.39-1.05) in Uruguay to 1.20 (1.19-1.20) in Brazil. Different R0 and Rt values may be related to the testing capacity of each country. CONCLUSION: R0 in the early phase of the outbreak varied across the South American countries. The public health measures adopted in the initial period of the pandemic appear to have reduced Rt over time in each country, albeit to different levels.


OBJETIVOS: Estimar el número de reproducción básico (R0 ) y el número de reproducción efectivo (Rt ) de la COVID-19 y contrastarlos con las medidas de salud pública implementadas en diez países de América del Sur. MÉTODOS: Los datos se obtuvieron del Centro Europeo para la Prevención y el Control de las Enfermedades. Se estimó el R0 de cada país durante las dos primeras semanas del brote y el Rt después de 90 días. RESULTADOS: Los países utilizaron una combinación de aislamiento, distanciamiento físico, cuarentena y medidas de contención en toda la comunidad para detener la propagación de la COVID-19 en diferentes momentos. El R0 osciló entre 1,52 (IC95%: 1,13-1,99) en Venezuela y 3,83 (IC95%: 3,04-4,75) en Chile, mientras que el Rt después de 90 días varió entre 0,71 (intervalo de credibilidad 95%: 0,39-1,05) en Uruguay y 1,20 (intervalo de credibilidad 95%: 1,19-1,20) en Brasil. Los diferentes valores de R0 y Rt pueden estar relacionados con la capacidad de llevar a cabo pruebas de detección viral de cada país. CONCLUSIÓN: Los valores del R0 en la fase inicial del brote variaron entre los países sudamericanos. Las medidas de salud pública adoptadas en el período inicial de la pandemia parecen haber reducido el Rt con el tiempo en cada país, aunque en niveles diferentes.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL